Wall v Mutuelle: The Court of Appeal Explores the Limits of Applicable Law - Frances McClenaghan, 1 Chancery Lane

31/03/14. In an article last June, I discussed the High Court decision of Wall v Mutuelle De Poitiers Assurances ([2013] EWHC 53 (QB)). I noted that Sir Richard Buxton had refused permission to appeal on the papers with the following comments:
An English judge, or for that matter an English conflicts lawyer would need to be persuaded that a revolution had taken place before he countenanced the determination of procedures for the adduction of evidence by reference to any system of law other than lex fori. The judgment of Tugendhat demonstrates that no such revolution has occurred.
Rome II’s impact has indeed revolutionised the choice of law rules with respect to accidents abroad. The Court of Appeal concluded, however, that...
Image ©iStockphoto.com/creepers888








