Rule 3.10: Looking Beyond 3.9 for Relief - Ian Miller, 1 Chancery Lane

15/04/14. The dreaded realisation that you have not complied with a rule or practice direction. Your life flashes past you and a cold sweat breaks out. Out comes rule 3.9 and the new criteria,Mitchell, a call to the insurers… Or perhaps r. 3.10 applies?
“Where there has been an error of procedure such as a failure to comply with a rule or practice direction- (a) The error does not invalidate any step taken in proceedings unless the court so orders…”
There are some nuggets to be found in the recent case of Integral Petroleum v SCU-Finanz AG [2014] EWHC 702 (Comm) in which the scope of r.3.10 was explored by Popplewell J.
In Integral the parties agreed an extension of time by e-mail for the service of the Particulars of Claim by 28 days to 6th June (in fact 28 days would have given until 10th June). The Particulars were served by e-mail at 18.41 on 10thJune meaning they were deemed served out of time. SCU challenged validity of service on the grounds that...
Image ©iStockphoto.com/PashaIgnatov








