This site uses cookies.

Fatal Accident Dependency Claims: A Working Example: Death of a Wife & Mother as a Result of Mesothelioma - Gordon Exall, Zenith Chambers

15/09/14. Reports of decisions on dependency calculations are always welcome. Fatal accident damages account for 4% of payments made in personal injury claims. The number of reported cases on damages is relatively small. Cases are often better investigated and less likely to go to trial because there are far fewer disputed issues. The case of Knauer -v- Ministry of Defence [2014] EWHC 2553 (QB) provides a working example of how damages are calculated. It also demonstrates the incorrect approach of some defendants to some aspects of claims for fatal damages.

THE FACTS OF KNAUER

Mrs Knauer had been exposed to asbestos when working as an administrator at a prison. As a result she developed mesothelioma and died at the age of 46. She had three sons aged 22, 20 and 16. The action was brought by her widower. She had what was described as an “old fashioned” relationship with her husband, in that she did most of the housework and shopping whilst he did household repairs. The couple ran a pub together.

THE MESOTHELIOMA

The judge described mesothelioma as a “hideous and incurable disease causing appalling suffering.” Mrs Knauer was no exception. She was in considerable pain, and knew she was suffering from a terminal illness, from diagnosis in March 2009 to the date of her death in August 2009...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/DNY59

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.