This site uses cookies.

Vicarious Liability: Footballers, Assault and 'Initiation Ceremonies' - Gordon Exall, Zenith Chambers & Hardwicke

25/01/16. It is well known that recently the Supreme Court heard a number of appeals in relation to vicarious liability, particularly for assaults by employees. While the decisions are pending it is useful to look at examples where these issues are being applied using the current law. The issue of vicarious liability for an “initiation ceremony” which involved intimate touching was considered by His Honour Judge Butler (sitting as a High Court judge) in GB -v- Stoke City Football Club Ltd [2015] EWHC 2862 (QB).

THE CASE

The claimant alleged that he had been assaulted whilst working as an apprentice footballer between 1986 – 88 when aged 16 – 17. On two occasions he had been subject to an assault (of a non-sexual nature) involving the use of a goalkeeper’s glove in an intimate area.

  • The alleged assailant had no direct responsibility for the supervision or discipline of the claimant.

  • There was not sufficiently close connection between the role of the alleged assailant with the defendant, the assault and the claimant to justify imposing vicarious liability.

THE VICARIOUS LIABILITY ISSUE

The claimant had obtained permission to proceed under s.33 of the Limitation Act in relation to the allegations of assault and vicarious liability for the alleged assault. However permission was not given in relation to a an action directly against the football club. The judge found that the claimant had not...

Image cc flickr.com/photos/gareth1953/6316198474/

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.