This site uses cookies.

Review of Highway Code Due for 2019 - Charles Heppenstall, Weightmans LLP

10/12/18. On the 18th October 2018 the Ministry of Transport announced a proposed update of the Highway Code, to further codify driving practices intended to protect cyclists and pedestrians. This follows the publication in September of the DoT’s highway casualty statistics for 2017. Although these revealed a 39% decrease in road casualties over the past decade, cyclist and (in particular) pedestrian fatalities remain at unacceptable levels. Pedestrian fatalities were up 5% on 2016 figures (470), and although cyclist fatalities were down 1% since 2016 (101), bicycle traffic had decreased by 5%, attributed to “natural variation”. Taking into account the waning “Tour De France” effect, for a Government eager to reduce motor travel in order to improve air quality and reduce obesity this is a trend heading in the wrong direction. The continuing strategy to instil in people the confidence to leave their cars at home is, therefore, of paramount importance to the Department.

The revamped Highway Code will provide refreshed focus on the practice of “close passing”, and promotion of the colourfully named “Dutch Reach” (the opening of a car door with the hand furthest from the handle to promote a natural check of the blind spot). In tandem with the publication (also last Thursday) of the National Standard for Cycling Training, a non mandatory comprehensive guide to competent and safe cycling, it is hoped that the casualty statistics will improve in 2019. Pressure groups Cycling UK and Living Streets have proclaimed the proposed changes a “major victory”.

On the other hand, a consultation on whether the offence of causing death by careless or dangerous driving should be expanded to include cyclists as part of the drive to safeguard pedestrians in particular, closed on 5 November 2018. This follows the death on 28th August of pedestrian Sakine Cihan, the first fatality involving an electric bicycle, and campaigning by Matt Briggs whose wife, Kim, was killed by a cyclist in 2016.

This thrusts the possibility of compulsory insurance for cyclists back into the limelight. For riders of electric bicycles at least this seems highly likely following the proposed review of the EC Motor Insurance Directive as just one consequence of Vnuk and the update of the definition of “motorised vehicle” to include electrically powered assisted cycles (EPACs).

Comment

Rather than a further shifting of the burden of diligence onto motorists, we see this development as simply part of the Government’s rolling campaign to improve road safety, and also as a part of more recent efforts to reduce traffic pollution on the streets of the UK. As the number of “catastrophic” pedestrian and cyclist casualties remains high, as a direct result of their high vulnerability as road users, any initiative which improves awareness and, as a consequence, the safety of those road users must be seen as a positive. With the heightening of awareness and promoting additional care when overtaking, turning at junctions and on the opening of doors the number of serious spinal and brain injuries is expected to decrease, thus reducing the number of claims in these areas.

For further information or assistance on any of these issues please contact:

Charles Heppenstall
Partner
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
DDI: 0113 213 4075

Image ©iStockphoto.com/Nikada

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.