This site uses cookies.

How can a plaintiff win a slip and fall lawsuit against a property owner or manager?

Consideration was given for the editing and publication of this post.

Slip, and falls are embarrassing under any circumstance. When a person falls on someone else's property and hurts himself or herself, often the first thought is to sue. Most people assume that falling on someone else's turf automatically calls for a personal injury lawsuit, but that isn't true. All plaintiffs must provide evidence of the owner's liability to win the lawsuit.

Every successful premises liability lawsuit in the USA has four integral components. Here are the four fundamental pieces of evidence that you need for strengthening your lawsuit –

  1. The duty of the defendant
  2. Notice
  3. Dangerous condition
  4. Injuries

Duty on the part of a defendant

The duty refers to the responsibility of the owner or the occupier of the property to keep it free from danger. The property owner must maintain the premises and take care of any condition that can pose a threat to the health of the passersby. Owed duty refers to the argument of responsibility of the premises where the accident took place.

For example – when an accident occurs on a rental property, where the owner and manager are not the same people, arguments often arise regarding the person who held the control of the premises when the injury actually occurred. The plaintiff will find it almost impossible to win the case without proving the defendant's owed duty. Visit the Hershey Personal Injury Attorney LA website to learn more about the role of a personal injury attorney in the establishment of premises liability.


Notice is vital for all slip and fall cases. For this process, you will need expert personal injury lawyers to call on experts for testifying to the typical industry practices of the maintenance of the property. That can include inspection, hazard prevention, and maintenance practices. It is a fundamental part of a successful premises liability lawsuit in Los Angeles.

There is always a chance that the defendant knew about the danger, but ignored it to save time or money or both. He or she may have neglected to remove the threat from the premises. While it is a rare scenario, since most US citizens are aware of the conditions that can lead up to a costly lawsuit and want to avoid them actively, it may have been a unique instance of gross negligence on the part of the defendant.

In most of the cases in LA, the defendant usually claims to not know about the hazard. In case the plaintiff's attorney proves otherwise, it can lead to the establishment of constructive notice. It depends on the personal lawsuit attorney to establish that the owner or manager of the premise failed to inspect the premises and defaulted from the standard practice of inspection. Only then, there is a possibility of the establishment of constructive notice.

For example – in case a person slips and falls in a supermarket on a sleek surface or fluid, it can be the responsibility of the manager or supervisor. While liquid spills are every day in public places, it is the responsibility of the manager or supervisor to inspect the store periodically. The absence of a warning sign or the defendant's claim of the lack of knowledge of a spill does not help his or her case.

Dangerous condition

It might seem outlandish to someone, who has already incurred an injury due to some form of danger present in the premises. However, it is imperative for the plaintiff's personal injury lawyer to prove that the threat actually existed at the time of the mishap on the premises. At the same time, the plaintiff must show that the defendant was aware of the danger, but did not take sufficient action to neutralize it.

In Los Angeles, is the attorney's responsibility to prove that the defendant had the chance to remove the danger or put up warning signs to warn the plaintiff, but he or she failed to do so on time. The negligence resulted in the creation of an unreasonable hazard that led to the plaintiff's injury. The lawyer needs to prove another factor in addition to the dangers present on the property – the intent of use of the premises. Your slip and fall, personal injury lawyer should be able to provide evidence that you were, indeed, using the premises correctly and conventionally.


In most cases, people do not report their injuries or the accident, up until the time their injuries become prominent. However, merely stating that the injuries are a result of the accident only is not enough to get compensation from the plaintiff. The plaintiff must have sufficient evidence that the injuries were a direct result of the mishap that resulted due to the gross negligence of the property owner or manager. For any successful premises liability litigation, it is imperative to have evidence. Without it, the defense might be able to convince the jury that the injuries were not a result of the accident at all and the plaintiff might lose whatever chance he or she has to receive compensation for the damage.

Once you file a complaint against the property owner or manager, they will file a document in response. That is the defendant's answer to the slip and fall litigation. The answer paves the way for the affirmative defenses. If the defendant can prove their validity, they can reduce the defendant's liability. We know several cases, where the victim of slip and fall injuries have tried to fight for their rightful compensation, but matters have become too complicated too soon. They have had to approach a personal injury lawyer midway, and it deferred the outcome.

If you have been in a slip and fall incident on someone else’s property, and you are seeking compensation for your medical bills and the physical pain you are going through, contact a reputed and genuine personal injury attorney as soon as possible. Personal injury laws can be different in different states. In Los Angeles, you should seek the help of a legal professional to be able to win your slip and fall personal injury litigation.