Another reminder about the risks of surveillance footage: Mantey v Ministry of Defence [2023] EWHC 761 (KB) - Anisa Kassamali, Temple Garden Chambers
23/04/23. Eyre J considered whether or not a former soldier had been fundamentally dishonest in his personal injury claim in light of surveillance footage.
Background
The claimant sought damages from the Ministry of Defence (The “MoD”) for Non-Freezing Cold Injury (“NFCI”) which he said he had suffered because of the MoD’s negligence and/or breach of statutory duty. The claimant said that he was suffering sundry continuing disabling symptoms and his medical evidence provided details on this. However, the claim was discontinued after the MoD adduced video-recorded surveillance evidence which was said to be inconsistent with those alleged symptoms. The case nonetheless continued in relation to the issue whether the claim was fundamentally dishonest...
Image ©iStockphoto.com/alice-photo