This site uses cookies.

Fast Paced Change in Catastrophic Brain Injury Litigation - Bill Braithwaite QC, Head of Exchange Chambers

08/11/14. Over the years, management of catastrophic brain injury has become increasingly specialised for lawyers, and it is interesting to see how some litigators have failed to keep up with the changes. Years ago, lawyers just got expert reports, costed them, and presented a financial claim to the insurer. Nowadays, in my opinion, good catastrophic injury lawyers take a real part in the rehabilitation of the injured person, help the family to cope with the catastrophe, resolve accommodation and care issues, help to obtain relevant equipment, and become involved in the creation of a plan for life.

When you take over someone else’s file, it is fascinating to see how they have approached the problems. Recently, I had that experience, and it emphasised to me that it can be difficult to distinguish between the truly expert and the apparently so. This file looked ok superficially, but in reality the solicitor had achieved nothing useful. To many people, though, it would not have been obvious that there had been any failings – doubtless all the relevant boxes were ticked.

Luckily, the client became so dissatisfied that he made a call to me, to ask for help. In those circumstances, I never give direct advice about what to do, I just tell people what their rights are. For example, they have the right to employ a solicitor in whom they have confidence, which usually means that he or she gets things done, and they have the right to change the solicitor if they are dissatisfied.

Bill Braithwaite QC
Head of Exchange Chambers
This article was first published at http://billbraithwaite.com/blog/

Image ©iStockphoto.com/Kuzma

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.