This site uses cookies.

Editorial: Looking Ahead to 2017 - Aidan Ellis, Temple Garden Chambers

22/12/16. As 2016 draws to a close, it feels more difficult than ever to make predictions for the year ahead. Politically, a period of uncertainty beckons. Although we know that Brexit negotiations will start next year, it seems wholly futile to try to guess what kind of deal might result. It is also too early to contemplate the domestic legal consequences. After a ‘great repeal bill’, what, if anything, will fill the gaps left by European law? Leaving the European Union could also re-open other debates which potentially impact on aspects of personal injury law, including that surrounding repeal of the Human Rights Act.

That personal injury litigation faces a period of uncertainty is therefore wholly consistent with the broader national mood. The immediate concern surrounds lower value cases, with the intention not only to impose a fixed tariff on whiplash cases but also to push many more personal injury cases onto the small claims track. But it would be a mistake to imagine that higher value cases will remain unscathed; the momentum is gathering behind the introduction of fixed fees at least onto the lower reaches of the multi-track.

Meanwhile, the programme of Court closures continues. Bow County Court, for instance, is well on the way to closure; the Courts and Tribunal Service website helpfully advises that new divorce cases should be sent to the Bury St Edmunds Divorce Centre more than 70 miles away. Their civil cases have largely been moved to Clerkenwell and Shoreditch County Court, which is building a reputation for a ferocious floating list of fast track trials. Although Court staff are doing the best that they can, the waiting time for applications and trials is only likely to increase in the short term.

There does not appear to have been an immediate slow-down in the number of civil cases, compared for instance with the impact of new costs on employment cases. But as I look ahead to 2017, it is with a renewed sense that the detail of coming legislative reforms could have a dramatic impact on our sector.

Aidan Ellis
Temple Garden Chambers

Image ©iStockphoto.com/PeskyMonkey

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.