This site uses cookies.

Pauline Carter v Kingswood Learning and Leisure Group Limited - Angus Piper, 1 Chancery Lane

26/07/18. Foskett J gave judgment on the 27th June 2018 on the claim of Pauline Carter v Kingswood Learning and Leisure Group Limited [2018] EWHC 1616 (QB), having heard evidence and submissions over 4 days earlier in the month. The trial was in respect of liability only, on a personal injury claim which was potentially worth a substantial sum as the Claimant had sadly suffered a stroke following a Vertebral Artery Dissection (VAD) which had left her with severe ongoing disabilities. The Claimant contended that she had sustained the VAD whilst engaging in an abseiling experience with the Defendant, on a purpose-built abseiling tower.

The abseiling experts agreed that the Claimant (who was a school teacher on a school trip) was being given a taste or experience of abseiling, rather than actually being taught to abseil. The experts agreed that with a chest harness and a taut safety rope, participants were effectively lowered down by an instructor and the whole process was extremely safe for them.

The tower had an initial very steep (63 degree) slope for the first couple of metres, following which the drop to the ground became vertical. The Claimant alleged that her upper body had been caused to suddenly “flop backwards”, thereby jerking her neck, at the point of transition to the vertical drop because of instructor inattention / lack of support on the safety rope, for which the Defendant was responsible. It was common ground between the abseil experts that the Defendant’s system was a safe one if properly implemented.

There would need to be slackness in the safety rope to permit the Claimant’s upper body to flop backwards in the manner that she contended had occurred. By the end of the trial it was accepted that with the safety system that was in place, there was only one mechanism by which the accident could have occurred as contended for by the Claimant. Namely, a scenario whereby the Claimant was holding herself stationary on her abseil rope, thus supporting her body weight on that rope, whilst simultaneously pulling her safety rope down towards her chest, thereby creating a degree of slack rope between her chest harness and her hand on the safety rope...

Image: public domain

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.