This site uses cookies.

State Immunity and Personal Injury in the High Court: Al-Masarir v Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [2022] EWHC 2199 (QB) - Sebastian Bates, Temple Garden Chambers

16/09/22. Under section 1(1) of the State Immunity Act 1978, ‘[a] State is immune from the jurisdiction of the courts of the United Kingdom except as provided in the following provisions’. In Al-Masarir v Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [2022] EWHC 2199 (QB), the High Court considered the exception set out in section 5 of the Act, according to which ‘[a] State is not immune as respects proceedings in respect of (a) death or personal injury; or (b) damage to or loss of tangible property, caused by an act or omission in the United Kingdom’.

Summary

The Claimant in Al-Masarir is a critic of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia who alleges that spyware was installed on his smartphones by the Kingdom’s agents. He was also followed and attacked in London in an episode for which he claims the Kingdom is responsible. He and his smartphones were present in the United Kingdom at all material times. He is seeking damages for personal injury.

The Claimant relied on section 5 to obtain permission to serve the claim form outside the jurisdiction from the Master. The Kingdom sought a declaration of its immunity under the Act and to have the Master’s order set aside.

Before Julian Knowles J, the Claimant contended that section 5 applies to both sovereign and non-sovereign conduct and does not require that all of a...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/3dotsad

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.