This site uses cookies.

Medical Records Review in Personal Injury - Dr Mark Burgin

26/04/19. Dr. Mark Burgin BM BCh (oxon) MRCGP explains why MedCo should consider providing guidance on medical records review to experts and solicitors.

The complex and time-consuming nature of an expert medical records review combined with a trivial payment for that review has led to a nihilist approach.

Since GDPR obtaining medical records is always proportionate on price alone but unless there is a question that needs answering it is not necessary.

A & E records typically contain more of the material details than a GP record as they include all areas of injury, descriptions of the visible injuries and diagnoses.

The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence meaning the GP expert has to transcribe the records and then provide an interpretation of those records to see what is missing.

There is a small minority of cases where the expert is instructed to answer part 35 questions without reference to the medical records which can mislead the court.

When medical records review is necessary

When the findings on examination indicate pre-existing problems but the claimant denies any history review can provide evidence to resolve the inconsistency.

When the claimant is returning for a re-examination the records can assist in supporting or contradicting the claimant’s ongoing symptoms.

In LVI cases the medical records can confirm pre-existing injuries that make the claimant unusually susceptible to a small impact.

Where questions have been raised on the expert opinions the medical records can provide further information to support the claimant’s or the defendant’s opinions.

Where the injuries were extensive or non-soft tissue (e.g. fracture) the medical records can provide confirmation of the exact diagnosis of injury (such as whether a joint was involved).

Where a specialist expert report is required the generalist expert can provide a detailed assessment of the records to save specialist time and provide interpretation of ambiguous records.

Challenging the Expert’s Opinion

Solicitor can challenge the expert saying that the...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/utah778

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.