Guide to Keeping Disputes out of Court - Justin Patten, Human Law
How to save money, maintain business relationships and avoid negative publicity by embracing the power of mediation to resolve business and employee disputes. This 14-page Guide provides a complete road map for managers who need to lower the cost of settling disagreements and disputes with employees, customers and suppliers.
|
|
NOTE: From 1st May 2020 online
journals are now zero VAT rated.
Write for PIBULJ.COM
Get your name seen by around 12,000 readers of our website and newsletters. Click here for more information on writing for us.
Advertise on PIBULJ.COM
Get your message seen by PI practitioners across the UK with a text ad, banner ad, or sponsored post on this website, or a banner ad in our newsletters. Click here for more information.
PI Industry News
Motor finance case solicitors hit out at Treasury intervention...
Expired MOT does not invalidate £21,500 credit hire car claim, rules CoA...
£2.15 Billion fatal accident claim is largest in English history......
Mahmood confirms whiplash tariff uplift, but claimant lawyers left disappointed...
Credit hire reform could take 100,000 cases out of court...
High Court judge dismisses appeal over rejection of cycling accident claim against council...
Solicitor involved in false PI claim loses strike-off appeal...
Supreme Court rules personal injury clients must agree to deductions...
Creditors owed £2.5m by closing PI firm set to get nothing...
Lawyers braced for personal injury discount rate change...
Credit Hire Articles
We have now published more than 50 specialist credit hire articles. A selection are shown below, or see the complete list here. Subscribers can also access, for free, the latest edition of Kevan & Ellis on Credit Hire.
28/09/23. Mr Justice Martin Spencer gave judgment in an appeal by the Claimant against the dismissal of the claim for credit hire charges on the basis that a lack of an MOT certi...
![Appeal judge rules that credit hire company has no costs liability following a finding of fundamental dishonesty in personal injury case: RSA v. Fastrack Solutions Limited [2023] 4 WLUK 92 - David Bowden, Erimus Chambers](/content/images/resized/images/stories/carkeys_72_72.jpg)
29/05/23. Mr Shazad staged a car accident on 25th November 2015. The other driver said at the beginning ‘ I thought the accident was suspicious straight away’ . A court claim ...
30/11/18. As long ago as 2004, in the course of carving out the impecuniosity exception in Lagden v O’Connor, Lord Nicholls expressed the hope that the parties “should be able t...
30/07/18. In Credit hire arguments go in circles, at least that is the experience of the writer (who has now been engaged in conducting credit hire claims for nearly 15 years), w...
11/09/14. In Dimond v Lovell the House of Lords made it all seem so simple. In a case where the claimant sought hire charges in the princely sum of £346.63, it was held that ...
10/04/14. Disputes relating to disclosure remain an enduring feature of credit hire litigation and, largely to the understandable annoyance of the judiciary, are the source of mu...
Privacy Policy Legal Resources
© Copyright Law Brief Publishing Ltd, all rights reserved.
Published by Law Brief Publishing Ltd, company number 05966609, registered in the UK. Registered office address: 30 The Parks, Minehead, Somerset, TA24 8BT.
All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain.
The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand.
Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.
Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.
