This site uses cookies.

What Are the Challenges Which the Internet Presents to Lawyers?

Brought to you by our friends at Prime Lawyers in Australia

Some might say that the rise of the internet has been as dramatic a technological shift as the industrial revolution. Not only that but it has come about in a much shorter time period, such is the huge speed of innovation and improvement in technology. But as we look back at over twenty years of the world wide web, how has it affected lawyers and their practices?

Well, first off on a day to day basis, so much is now done electronically that we all take much of it for granted. Correspondence is by email and documents can potentially be exchanged electronically. This might just sound like a convenience but what it has done is to speed up the process of justice in some ways. But what it might also have done is to slow it down since when the copying of documents and case law is in effect so easy, there is a temptation to throw everything in for the avoidance of doubt rather than having to face the discipline of choosing what is relevant.

Another practical effect is in dealings with the client which again have become much easier. This is not just due to email but also to technology such as online video conferencing which means that clients and lawyers can keep in touch even if the lawyers were in Australia (such as those at Prime Lawyers) and the client was in the UK. The flip side of this is that some lawyers might see this as turning their job into a 24/7 occupation although in reality it’s perfectly do-able to have a shift system with people covering for night-time work and the like.

But beyond these practical effects on the profession itself, there are also numerous challenges which the internet has raised to the issues which might be in dispute. The obvious one concerns jurisdictional matters. In other words, having to decide where things actually took place when they were transacted online and then deciding if a particular country’s courts have jurisdiction to hear the dispute. Then, even if they can hear the dispute, it isn’t necessarily inevitable that their particular law will apply to all aspects and so the choice of law itself can be further complicated by the nature of the internet.

Finally, there are evidential matters which can arise. These are not just about electronic signatures but might involve looking at exactly what took place in an electronic transaction. In doing so, technical questions might arise as to how electronic evidence should be given and even possibly as the authenticity of that evidence. How can you tell, for example, if electronic evidence has been forged or not?

So, there is no doubt that the internet has dramatically changed not only the way lawyers work but in some cases even what they are arguing about in court. Given that technological innovation is continuing apace, particularly with the growth of sites such as Facebook and Twitter, it will certainly be interesting to see how this all develops and impacts upon practice into the future.

Find out more about Prime Lawyers

Image ©iStockphoto.com/prizela_ning

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.