PIBULJ
What Are the Challenges Which the Internet Presents to Lawyers?
Brought to you by our friends at Prime Lawyers in Australia
Some might say that the rise of the internet has been as dramatic a technological shift as the industrial revolution. Not only that but it has come about in a much shorter time period, such is the huge speed of innovation and improvement in technology. But as we look back at over twenty years of the world wide web, how has it affected lawyers and their practices?
Well, first off on a day to day basis, so much is now done electronically that we all take much of it for granted. Correspondence is by email and documents can potentially be exchanged electronically. This might just sound like a convenience but what it has done is to speed up the process of justice in some ways. But what it might also have done is to slow it down since when the copying of documents and case law is in effect so easy, there is a temptation to throw everything in for the avoidance of doubt rather than having to face the discipline of choosing what is relevant.
Another practical effect is in dealings with the client which again have become much easier. This is not just due to email but also to technology such as online video conferencing which means that clients and lawyers can keep in touch even if the lawyers were in Australia (such as those at Prime Lawyers) and the client was in the UK. The flip side of this is that some lawyers might see this as turning their job into a 24/7 occupation although in reality it’s perfectly do-able to have a shift system with people covering for night-time work and the like.
But beyond these practical effects on the profession itself, there are also numerous challenges which the internet has raised to the issues which might be in dispute. The obvious one concerns jurisdictional matters. In other words, having to decide where things actually took place when they were transacted online and then deciding if a particular country’s courts have jurisdiction to hear the dispute. Then, even if they can hear the dispute, it isn’t necessarily inevitable that their particular law will apply to all aspects and so the choice of law itself can be further complicated by the nature of the internet.
Finally, there are evidential matters which can arise. These are not just about electronic signatures but might involve looking at exactly what took place in an electronic transaction. In doing so, technical questions might arise as to how electronic evidence should be given and even possibly as the authenticity of that evidence. How can you tell, for example, if electronic evidence has been forged or not?
So, there is no doubt that the internet has dramatically changed not only the way lawyers work but in some cases even what they are arguing about in court. Given that technological innovation is continuing apace, particularly with the growth of sites such as Facebook and Twitter, it will certainly be interesting to see how this all develops and impacts upon practice into the future.
Find out more about Prime Lawyers
Image ©iStockphoto.com/prizela_ning
August 2013 Contents
Welcome to the August 2013 issue of PI Brief Update Law Journal. Click the relevant links below to read the articles and take the CPD quiz. Please remember to fill in our quick feedback form after you have finished. CPD Quiz The quiz is designed to meet the CPD requirements of the SRA and provides 1.5 hours accredited distance learning. Law Brief Publishing Ltd is registered with the Solicitors Regulation Authority for England and Wales, ref EGB/LBPL. The CPD is also valid for cILEX (formerly ILEX) members and for members of the Chartered Insurance Institute (CII). Please check with the relevant organisation for full details of their CPD rules. Take the CPD Quiz Feedback Form CPD Information Download PIBULJ PDF to Read on your PC, Phone or Tablet We have made this month's issue into a PDF so that you can download it to read on the train, in the garden, or anywhere else you might not have a good internet connection. There are two versions, one is optimised for reading on a computer, iPad, other tablets, or for printing. The other one is optimised for reading on iPhones, Android phones etc. Access the PIBULJ August 2013 PDF Version
|
|
| Personal Injury Articles | |
Decoding the Statutory Defence - Mark Fowles, Browne Jacobson LLP We tend to forget how novel, in the context of the history of personal injury claims, are accidents on the highway. The current Section 41 of the Highways Act 1980 can trace its history back to no earlier than to Section 1 (1) of the Highways (Miscellaneous) Provisions Act 1961... |
Editorial: Striking Out Claims and the Right to a Fair Hearing - Aidan Ellis, Temple Garden Chambers The initial indications, many of which have drawn comment in this journal, are that the Courts are using the new emphasis on proportionality together with the narrower approach to relief from sanctions in CPR 3.9 to impose significant sanctions including strike out for breaches of the procedural rules and Court orders. |
RTA Post Jackson, How to Deal With Them 3 Months on: What Have We Learned? - Andrew Mckie, Clerksroom (LASPO), Sections 56, 57 and 59 of the Act are in relation to the prohibition of the payment and receipt of referral fees in personal injury cases commenced on 1 April 2013. "A significant number of businesses involved in the personal injury market have been acting in breach of... |
Jurisdiction Over Torts Occurring Outside the EU: the Decision in Stylianou v Toyoshima [2013] EWHC 2188 - Sarah Prager, 1 Chancery Lane Sarah Prager considers the recent decision in Stylianou v Toyoshima [2013] EWHC 2188 relating to jurisdiction over torts occurring outside the EU. |
Summer Cycling: Space to Roll and Strict Liability - Frances McClenaghan, 1 Chancery Lane The long hot summer has encouraged not just questionable sartorial choices but an influx in the number of commuters hopping on bikes. Sadly, this has led to a high number of cyclist deaths. A few days ago a man died after being hit by a lorry near Archway... |
Jackson in Action: the 1st April Reforms Begin to Take Effect - Shirley Denyer, Shirley Denyer LLP & Knowledge Services Consultant for FOIL Four months in from the introduction of the new rules both claimant and defendant lawyers are getting used to the new regime and attention is turning to how the new rules work in practice. Even without the changes introduced by the new RTA and EL/PL protocols and portal, there is much... |
No Smoke Without Fire: Fire Service Liability - Andrew Roy, 12 King's Bench Walk Wembridge and 14 others v (1) Winter (2) East Sussex Fire Service and another [2013] EWHC 2331 (QB). These claims arose out of a mass explosion which occurred at a fireworks factory at Marlie Farm in East Sussex on 3 December 2006... |
Legionnaires' Disease, Is There a Claim? - Kirsty Clifton, Ascot Lawyers Headache, muscle pain, high fever, chest pain, a persistent cough, breathing difficulties, loss of appetite, diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting.... this may sound like a nasty bout of the flu, however these same symptoms could also arise from contraction of Legionnaire's Disease. |
The Mesothelioma Bill: Does It Go Far Enough? - Ruth Johnson, Blake Lapthorn Mesothelioma is a rare cancer of the lungs caused, it is thought, exclusively from exposure to asbestos. It begins in the mesothelium which is the membrane that lines and protects the lungs, the heart and the abdominal cavity. There are three main types of mesothelioma... |
Under-Settlement: First VWF Scheme Professional Negligence Case Reported - Ivor Collett, 1 Chancery Lane Former miners who had worked for British Coal were offered a tariff-based government compensation scheme from 1999 if they could show they had developed symptoms of vibration white finger (VWF - now more commonly referred to as hand arm vibration syndrome or HAVS). The scheme was the result of extensive negotiations between ex-miners' representatives (principally claimant solicitors' firms) and the DTI, which took over responsibility for British Coal's liabilities. |
Johnson v Unisys Revisited: Monk v Cann Hall Primary School and Essex County Council [2013] EWCA Civ 826 - Frances McClenaghan, 1 Chancery Lane Mrs Monk was made redundant from her position as an administrative assistant at the First Respondent's primary school, with effect from 31st August 2008. On 10th July, however, she was required to clear her desk before being publicly escorted from the premises... |
Accepting Help After Serious Injury - Bill Braithwaite QC, Head of Exchange Chambers When we evaluate a compensation claim, we always start by working out what the injured person needs, by way of accommodation and support, and all the other elements of a substantial personal injury case. However, it is vitally important to remember that need is not the only test of whether a person receives compensation; in some cases, "want" is also decisive. |
The Length of Judgments and the Cost of Litigation - Thomas Crockett, 1 Chancery Lane For a number of reasons, the cost of litigation is a hot topic at the moment. Lord Justice Mummery in giving the lead judgment of the Court of Appeal in Neumans LLP v Andrew Andronikou & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 916, suggested a way that he and his brethren could assist in ensuring that legal costs are kept to a minimum by judges keeping their judgments as short as possible... |
Dog Eat Dog: Professional Negligence Is the New Personal Injury - Julie Carlisle, Boyes Turner When the news of the Jackson reforms first began to circulate more than one person connected with the profession suggested quietly that a move into professional negligence might be the way to ensure profitability... |
Whipped! - Paul Stanton Everyone is no doubt aware of the ongoing litigation involving Andrew Mitchell MP, the former Government Chief Whip. He is currently bringing a libel case against The Sun newspaper for it's allegations that Mr Mitchell had sworn at (and generally abused) a Downing Street police officer-front page "news" at the time... |
What Exactly Are Defective Thought Processes? - Bill Braithwaite QC, Head of Exchange Chambers This is another post about mental capacity, but it's more of a question. When we consider whether an injured person has mental capacity, ie the ability to manage his or her own affairs, we are interested in their thought processes, not simply the decisions they make. In fact, it is clear that making bad decisions does not necessarily prove that someone lacks capacity... |
Flash for Cash - Philip Waters, Camps Solicitors Last week we saw a car crash scam, 'flash for cash' come to light. According to the Asset Protection Unit, this scam involves criminals flashing their lights to let other drivers out of a junction, before crashing into them on purpose. This is clearly a despicable practice, but there is little evidence that is a wide-spread or growing problem... |
Why I'm Not in Sympathy With the Whiplash Debate - Bill Braithwaite QC, Head of Exchange Chambers The headline - "Claimant campaigners today hailed the report as a 'welcome shift to transparency and truth' in the whiplash debate" made me think. I'm a claimant only advocate, and I spend my life seeing claimants who have suffered catastrophic injury. I believe passionately in their rights, and in achieving justice for them. But... |
Summary of Recent Cases, August 2013 Here is a summary of the recent notable court cases over the past month. |
PI Practitioner, August 2013 Each issue a particular topic is highlighted, citing some of the useful cases and other materials in that area. This month: Vicarious Liability |
| Medico-Legal Articles, Edited by Dr Hugh Koch | |
The Benefits of Earlier Interventions for Children in Road Traffic Accidents: Less Cost, Faster Recovery and Quicker Claim Settlement - Tracy King One of the biggest health threats to children in Europe is road traffic accidents (RTA). Each year in Europe, approximately 9000 children and adolescents under the age of 19 die in an RTA, and 355 000 are injured... |
|
| Mediation & ADR Articles, Edited by Tim Wallis, Trust Mediation Ltd | |
Potential Pitfalls in Pi Mediations: The DMU - Tim Wallis, Trust Mediation Ltd It is a basic, but crucial, rule of mediation that each party needs its "Decision Making Unit", or DMU, to be present at, or at the very least, remotely connected to, the mediation. If a person who holds the purse strings or is otherwise influential in the final decision does not attend the mediation the prospects of reaching a settlement at... |
|
PIBULJ, August 2013
Welcome to PIBULJ. Subscribers please click here to login, or proceed to the August 2013 contents page if you are already logged in.
If you haven't yet subscribed to PIBULJ and would like to read this and other articles, remember that you can try it out free for one month. You can sign up online here in just two minutes, and we'll get you activated as quickly as we can.
Join PIBULJ, the UK's leading personal injury journal for the very latest opinions and case law from the country's leading practitioners.
Over 700 personal injury articles and 50 credit hire articles written by our team of more than 100 specialist PI barristers and other legal experts.
Included free: the new edition of Kevan & Ellis on Credit Hire, published chapter by chapter.
Also for free: now includes 1.5 hours of CPD each month via an online multiple choice quiz (full info here).
All this for just £199+vat per year for your whole solicitors' office! £125+vat for barristers*. Reduced rates for students, pupils, garden leave, etc. Contact us for details.
We also have discounts for multiple office use. Please contact us to discuss your requirements.
No credit card is required, just fill in your details and we will send you an invoice. Or alternatively you can pay online by credit card via Paypal.
If you have any questions at all about subscribing please call us on 08445 UPDATE (08445 873283) or email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .
* For these purposes "barrister" means a barrister in independent practice rather than an employed barrister.
Summer Cycling: Space to Roll and Strict Liability - Frances McClenaghan, 1 Chancery Lane
26/08/13. The long hot summer has encouraged not just questionable sartorial choices but an influx in the number of commuters hopping on bikes. Sadly, this has led to a high number of cyclist deaths. A few days ago a man died after being hit by a lorry near Archway. He is the sixth cyclist to be killed in London this year and the fourth in collision with a HGV. These deaths have triggered ‘space for cycling’ protests...
Image ©iStockphoto.com/olaser
Accepting Help After Serious Injury - Bill Braithwaite QC, Head of Exchange Chambers
25/08/13. When we evaluate a compensation claim, we always start by working out what the injured person needs, by way of accommodation and support, and all the other elements of a substantial personal injury case. However, it is vitally important to remember that need is not the only test of whether a person receives compensation; in some cases, “want” is also decisive.
Image ©iStockphoto.com/pcatalin
Welcome to the August 2013 issue of PI Brief Update Law Journal. Click the relevant links below to read the articles and take the CPD quiz. Please remember to fill in our quick feedback form after you have finished.








