This site uses cookies.

The Portal, Fixed Costs and Claims on the Multi-Track - Andrew Spencer, 1 Chancery Lane

08/12/16. Since the coming into force of the fixed costs regimes for road traffic accident, employer’s liability, and public liability, it has been unclear whether fixed costs apply to a claim properly started in the Portal, but which ends up being allocated to the Multi-Track – for example because the case develops such that the case value exceeds £25,000.

The unfairness of fixed costs applying to Multi-Track cases is plain: the fixed costs assume a trial lasting no longer than a day, without multiple expert witnesses. Multi-track cases are likely to involve significantly higher costs than necessary for fast track cases.

The Court of Appeal grappled with this issue in Qadar v Esure [2016] EWCA Civ 1109, and held:-

a) The detailed provisions of CPR 45.29A and B, “lead clearly to the conclusion that fixed costs apply to all cases properly started within the RTA Protocol but then continuing outside it, regardless of whether allocated to the fast track, to the multi-track, or, indeed, not allocated at all but dealt with at a disposal hearing”.

b) Nothing in the CPR conflicts with that outcome, nor would that outcome be irrational, even though it would lead to “rough justice” in some cases.

c) But it is clear it was never the intention of legislators that the fixed costs regime would apply to cases that ended up on the multi-track. This can only have arisen from a drafting mistake. Something has gone wrong.

The Court of Appeal unanimously found that the fixed costs regime should only apply “so long as the claim is not allocated to the multi-track” and that this should be added in to 45.29B.

By no means does this resolve all of the questions arising from the fixed cost regime. What of cases that settle for more than £25,000, before a claim is issued? The Court of Appeal invited the Rule Committee to consider this as soon as possible. One answer is that a higher value case is not “properly started” under the Protocol, so not subject to fixed costs. Watch this space…

Andrew Spencer
1 Chancery Lane

Image ©iStockphoto.com/DNY59

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.