This site uses cookies.

Case Summary: M v W - Helen Reynolds, Spencers Solicitors

14/01/21. Case Name: M v W


Accident Date: 19/06/2012

Settlement Date: 26/02/2020



The Claimant, aged 9 at the time of the accident, was riding his bike through the local park when he hit a tree stump, which was disguised by overgrown grass, causing him to fall from his bike. The Claimant suffered a fracture of his left arm with bruising to his face and leg.

The Claimant’s fracture was initially manipulated under anaesthesia, but the fractures not properly reduce, and hence he underwent open reduction surgery with internal fixation. He subsequently underwent a second surgery to remove the nails.

The initial medical evidence confirmed the Claimant had recovered well from a functional point of view, but had a severe hypertrophic scar as a result of the surgery which would take 18 months to fully mature. The scar was raised, red and firm.

The Claimant underwent treatment to the form of silicone sheeting, pressure garment and a course of injection therapy to improve the appearance of his scar.

Although improved, the Claimant remained concerned about the appearance of the scar which appeared stretched and thin, and at the end still slightly raised and red.

Updated medical evidence suggested that the scar was likely to improve further, but could be expedited with laser or fat transfer to give more cushioning underneath. There were no long term functional implications.

The Claimant was represented by a litigation friend and the settlement was approved at an Infant Settlement hearing.


Liability was admitted by the third-party insurers.


The Claimant received a global settlement of £18,650.00

No formal breakdown was provided; however the Claimant’s Solicitors estimate a breakdown of £14,000.00 general damages and £4,650 special damages. 

Solicitors for the Claimant
Helen Reynolds of Spencers Solicitors Limited

Solicitors for the Defendant
: Weightmans LLP

Image ©

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.