This site uses cookies.

29 August 2008 - PI Practitioner

Workplace Slipping

Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Regulations 12 (1) (2) and (3)

McCondichie v Mains Medical Centre
[2004] Rep. L.R.4; [2003] G.W.D. 35-993

Employer’s liability; ice in medical practice car park; applicability of Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 to persons other than employees;

Car park is part of the workplace. Regulation 12 (3) does not require the risk of slippage to be eliminated entirely, merely that the employer take reasonable steps to minimise the risk

Ellis v Bristol City Council
[2007] EWCA Civ 685

Workplace; floors; strict liability under Regulation 12 (1) and (2); Approved Code of Practice; slipping on urine on floor

Surface of a workplace floor must not be slippery. Regulations 12 (1) and (2) required floor not to be slippery whether permanent state or temporary state of slipperiness occurring with a sufficient degree of frequency and regularity. Code of practice relevant, could be referred to even though not pleaded and not put to witnesses.

Merseyside Fire & Civil Defence Authority v Bassie
[2005] EWCA Civ 1474

Workplace slipping; Regulation 12 (3); fireman slipping on layer of fine dust.

Dust on the floor was a substance which might cause a person to slip and it was reasonably practicable to keep the floor clear of dust by mopping. Breach of Regulation 12 (3).

Lewis v Avidan Ltd (T/A High Meadow Nursing Home)
[2005] EWCA Civ 670

Employer’s Liability; Slipping on unexpected flood water from a concealed pipe; Regulations 5 and 12 of the Workplace Regulations

The workplace included the floor on which the Claimant slipped but not the water pipe itself. No breach of Regulation 5 as the floor had been maintained in an efficient state. No breach of Regulation 12 (3) as not reasonably practicable for the employer to have acted differently.

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.