This site uses cookies.

News Category 2

The Mesothelioma Bill - Jamie Hanley, Pattinson & Brewer

02/12/13. Jamie Hanley, partner at Pattinson & Brewer and Labour’s parliamentary candidate for his home seat of Pudsey, comments on the Mesothelioma Bill. Today, Parliament considers the second reading of the Mesothelioma Bill and I very much welcome the Labour Party’s support for this Bill and their ongoing commitment to support the plight of asbestos victims.

Mesothelioma is a form of cancer caused by exposure to asbestos – it is always fatal and tragically leads to a painful lingering death for the victim. It is a long-tail disease, which means people exposed to asbestos many years ago, are only now discovering the consequences of their employers’ negligence.

The Mesothelioma Bill seeks to provide the legislative framework for a UK-wide Diffuse Mesothelioma Payment Scheme to make...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/hroe

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

 

Case Closed on the Cancellation Regulations? - Aidan Ellis, Temple Garden Chambers

30/11/13. The Cancellation of Contracts made in a Consumer’s Home or Place of Work etc Regulations 2008 render certain agreements between a trader and consumer unenforceable, if the consumer was not provided with a correctly drafted notice setting out his right to cancel the agreement. In cases such as Wei v Cambridge Power and Light(10 September 2010), the courts began applying the Regulations to credit hire agreements with the result that many were deemed unenforceable. Credit hire organisations responded in a variety of ways. In revised standard contracts, they either sought to comply with the Regulations by incorporating cancellation notices (which provoked a flurry of litigation about the meaning of...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/peepo

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

The Dangers of Unreasonably Refusing to Mediate: PGF II SA -v- OMFS Company 1 Limited - Kate Andrews, Browne Jacobson LLP

29/11/13. Kate Andrews considers the recent Court of Appeal decision in PGF II SA –v- OMFS Company 1 Limited (2013); its importance for those involved in litigation and the adverse costs consequences that can result where a party unreasonably refuses, or ignores, a request to mediate.

Background

The case of PGF related to dilapidations, with the parties to the proceedings being a landlord and tenant of three floors of a commercial property in London. During the course of proceedings, the defendant made a part 36 offer. The claimant responded by requesting (in a detailed letter suggesting dates and mediators) that the parties mediate. The defendant did not...

Image cc David Dixon

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

Holiday Claims: Hotel Structure: Local Standards and How These Are Determined - Andrew Spencer, 1 Chancery Lane

27/11/13. The Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the landmark case of Japp v Virgin Holidays [2013] EWCA Civ 1371, dismissing the Defendant’s appeal and upholding the first instance finding of liability. This is now the most authoritative decision on local standards for structural features of hotels in holiday claims. Andrew Spencer represented the Claimant and Sarah Prager the Defendant.

Local standards – when, what, where and how?

Had there been relevant binding building regulations assessment of the local standard would have been straightforward. The Court of Appeal agreed that absent binding regulations, a non-binding code could set the...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/AbackPhotography

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

Costs Budgeting: Benefits and Pitfalls - Sue Nash, Litigation Costs Services

25/11/13. The new costs budgeting regime has been described by the current Master of the Rolls as being the key to the Jackson Reforms. Meanwhile, Lord Justice Neuberger when Master of the Rolls stated that: Excess legal costs has for too long disfigured our civil justice system….. Should [the Jackson Reforms] fail to reduce costs, it seems to me that we will face a stark choice: the rejection of the English Costs Rules and the adoption of either a US-style costs rule or a German-style fixed costs regime”...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/DNY59

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.