This site uses cookies.

News Category 2

Workplace Safety Shift - Scott Whyte, Watermans Solicitors

13/11/13. The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 came into force on 1st October 2013, and brought with it the most significant shift in civil liability for accidents at work in a generation. Part 5 of the Act is entitled Reduction of Legislative Burdens and includes section 69 which outlines changes to civil liability for breach of health and safety duties under s.47 of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (HSWA). The effect of s.69 is such that it reverses the presumption than any breach of the HSWA or any subsequently enacted legislation would carry both criminal and civil liability. This means in effect that from...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/Gannet77

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

Lest We Forget (Our Senses) - Thomas Crockett, 1 Chancery Lane

11/11/13. Personal injury law has a poor image in the eyes of the general public. For many reasons of course, this is unfair. Often it is the overreactions of various (frequently Public Sector) organisations who utterly overreact to potential alleged “health and safety risks”. Examples are legion: conkers in schools, blu-tac on walls and Christmas decorations are all subjects of recent media hype, when they have been cited by over-zealous (to be charitable about them) health and safety advisors as being sources of potential injury and consequent expensive litigation...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/Wikkie

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

 

Safe Sex: Part 3 - Simon Readhead QC, 1 Chancery Lane

08/11/13. Sex activity is in every sense a personal choice. Ordinarily this truism might not find its way into legal submissions and certainly not submissions by the Solicitor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia. However, ordinarily injuries at work do not arise from a “vigorous” sex session in a motel bedroom.

Regular readers will recall the story so far in relation to this unfortunate “on the job” injury which raises important questions for personal injury and employment lawyers in the UK about the types of activities which can properly be said to arise out of or in the course of employment...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/stacey_newman

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

CA Suggest No Need for Causation in HRA Claims? - Edward Bishop QC, 1 Chancery Lane

05/11/13. The Court of Appeal has given judgment in Sarjantson v The Chief Constable of Humberside Police [2013] EWCA Civ 1252, an important and interesting decision on the operation of police officers’ duties to protect citizens under the Human Rights Act 1998 (“HRA”).

Mr Sarjantson (“C”) was attacked and injured by a group of young men armed with baseball bats and bricks in the early hours of 9thSeptember 2006. Several members of the public made 999 calls to the police, describing the group as violent and dangerous and reporting that they were attacking various people. The first time that C’s name was mentioned - as a victim of the attacks - was about seven minutes after the first...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/egal

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

Costs Budgeting: Recent Developments - Christopher Edwards, Old Square Chambers

30/10/13. Costs budgeting is now firmly a part of PI litigation: form ‘precedent H’ and the first case management (or more properly costs management) hearing are becoming increasingly familiar to practitioners. Costs budgeting was introduced on 1st April 2013 by the amended CPR rules 3.12 to 3.18, which are supported by the practice direction 3E. These provisions are fairly short and are worth reading in full. In summary, parties are expected to attempt to agree their respective budgets, and if so the extent of...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/peepo

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.