This site uses cookies.

A Novel Duty of Care by Geneticists to Provide Information: ABC v St. George’s Healthcare NHS Trust and Others [2017] EWCA Civ 336 - Lawrence Caun, Lamb Chambers

15/08/17. The Court of Appeal in this case realized that it might be creating a novel duty of care in deciding that it is arguable that geneticists could be liable for a failure to provide information to a claimant (“C”) about her father’s diagnosis of Huntington’s disease. The Court reversed the striking out of a claim by Nicol J. [(2015] EWHC 1394)

Huntington’s disease is incurable and a child has a 50% chance of inheriting it from a parent. The disease inflicts brain cell damage causing inevitable cognitive, motor and behavioural deterioration and personality change.

The tragic history was that C’s father killed her mother in 2007, afterwards being detained under a Hospital Order. He was diagnosed with Huntington’s in 2009. A multidisciplinary case conference on 2nd September 2009 had considered whether to override his patient confidentiality by disclosing his condition to C, taking account of his wish not to reveal the information to her so as not to cause her additional distress. They decided not to disclose the information. On that same day, C had revealed that she was pregnant. She accidentally discovered the information about her father’s condition in August 2010, five months after giving birth to a daughter. Tests subsequently revealed that she too has the Huntington’s gene. She claimed that she would have terminated the pregnancy if she had received that information in September 2009.

The decision identified the...

Image cc flickr.com/photos/pagedooley/5283257753

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.