This site uses cookies.

It's All Down to Evidence - Bill Braithwaite QC, Head of Exchange Chambers

28/12/15. I know there’s an element of repetition about my blogs, but I think that’s because some points crop up again and again, and seem to me to be fundamentally important. Sometimes, when I read reports of cases which have been decided by the courts, I'm amazed that one side or the other seems to have had such poor evidence. In the world of personal injury litigation, I think it might be true to say that almost all cases are won or lost on the basis of the evidence. When litigators lose sight of that fact, they often come unstuck. So many of the “interesting” points of law which are decided by courts are being litigated because the evidence has not decided the issue. Of course, in order to obtain the evidence, one has to know what the issues, both factual and legal, are likely to be, and that often requires experience.

I had a consultation not long ago with two experts, discussing a common and straightforward point which frequently arises in catastrophic personal injury litigation, and I was left without the foggiest idea of what the right answer is. As there’s at least a million pounds riding on this issue, it would be nice if I felt that the experts had guided me to the solution. Luckily, we have time to put things right, but that might involve using different experts, with the obvious costs penalty. Balancing cost and benefit, though, it looks sensible.

If new experts can give a reliable indication of the rights and wrongs of the problem, we will know where we are, and we can negotiate accordingly.

Some people (including the Court of Appeal?) might call this “expert shopping”, using that phrase in a critical way. I would disagree fundamentally, provided that the litigator does not simply look for an expert who will toe the party line. If we all made it our business to find and use experts who were truly expert, many issues would vanish.

Bill Braithwaite QC
Head of Exchange Chambers
This article was first published at http://billbraithwaiteqc.com/blog/

Image ©iStockphoto.com/DNY59

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.