This site uses cookies.

Blankley v Central Manchester NHS [2015] EWCA Civ 18: A Narrow Issue? - Matthew Smith, Kings Chambers

20/02/15. The claimant was very seriously injured by the defendant’s clinical negligence. Her capacity to litigate fluctuated. When she had capacity she agreed a CFA with her solicitors. She then lost capacity. On accepted authority, that loss of capacity immediately terminated the solicitors’ agency. The judge at first instance accepted that this brought the contract of retainer to an end. No subsequent retainer was agreed on behalf of the claimant by the person who ultimately became her deputy (a partner in the conducting firm of solicitors). The solicitors plainly acted on CFA terms and claimed a success fee in the bill for the period after the loss of capacity. The judge at first instance concluded that the demised CFA had not been replaced. There was no subsequent CFA in writing. Accordingly, by reason of section 58 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, there was no enforceable retainer between the client and the solicitors for the period after loss of capacity.

Phillips J sitting with assessors [2014] EWHC 168 (QB) allowed an appeal by the claimant having concluded that the claimant’s CFA was not frustrated and did not terminate upon the claimant’s loss of capacity. The defendant appealed. On 27 January 2015, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment. The reasons were given by...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/RapidEye

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.