This site uses cookies.

Knocked Down in Greece: EU Law, Brexit, and Broken Legs - Ross Beaton, Lamb Chambers

25/10/16. Hardly a day goes by without another story about how hard it will be for Britain to extricate itself from the EU. What will happen to banking regulations? What about immigration? Beyond the marquee issues, though, the questions go much further. Whoever thought that compensation schemes for accidents involving uninsured drivers would be affected? That they will be is clear from Moreno v MIB [2016] UKSC 52. As the Court commented, while a British person injured by an uninsured driver in Greece, as in this case, now has a straightforward mechanism to claim, it was not ever thus – and “with British exit from the Union, this will, no doubt, be one of the many current arrangements requiring thought” – Lord Mance at [3].

Ms Moreno, a UK resident, was on holiday in Greece when she was run down by a Greek driver, who had no insurance and apparently no driving licence at all. The accident was serious, and Ms Moreno lost her leg. She returned to the UK, and sought to bring a substantial claim, including loss of earnings. Under EU law, given direct effect in the UK, she could do this fairly simply.

The mechanics were as follows. If someone is injured in an RTA elsewhere in the EU, EU regulations (the Sixth Directive 2009/103/EC, to be precise), provides that they can sue the uninsured drivers’ bureau in their own member state, which can recover from the equivalent bureau in the state where the accident took place, which bureau then has a subrogated claim against the uninsured driver. This process used to be significantly more cumbersome than it is today, and the ability of victims to recover damages has been...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.